Google

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Palm's Pre-dicament

Palm PrePalm has announced that they will be releasing their much anticipated smartphone, the Pre, on June 6th - two days before Apple's WWDC and presumably, the announcement of the new iPhone.  There has been much speculation as to how the Pre will stack up against the iPhone, as well as other heavy-hitters like the Google Android Phones and Windows Mobile phones. 

My hope for the Pre is that it succeeds, that it becomes popular with those on the Sprint network and eventually sprouts up at other carriers.  Why?  Because it's a damn good-looking phone with a really nice operating system, that's why.  The webOS is slick - sometimes slicker than the iPhone's OS and offers some features that Apple's golden child doesn't, like support for Flash, a 3 mega-pixel camera, LED flash, wireless charging capabilities, and real use of cloud-based computing services.

The touch functionality doesn't look like it was added on at the end, as was the case with the Blackberry Storm.  From the videos I've seen and spec sheets I've read, the Palm Pre could be the phone that breathes new life into a company on the verge of disintegration.

Of course, Palm's history doesn't paint a very good picture for the future of the company.  Its Treo "smart" phones were notorious for impromptu restarts, dropped calls, and a variety of other problems.  Most of this was due to its very outdated software, which didn't look like it was improved upon since the Palm V.  The webOS, however, appears to be quite polished and a great step in the right direction for Palm - as does the lack of a stylus.  The user is able to exact a variety of different touch gestures on the device's 3.1-inch screen, several of which are very similar to another popular touchscreen device, and they all have those little nuances that make the experience much more rewarding.  For example, flicking a window to one side when there is no window beside it forces that window to "bounce" from side to side slightly before it settles into its original position.

I have not had the pleasure to use the device just yet, but from the many user-generated videos I've seen on YouTube and the demos I've viewed from various tech conventions, I can say that this is the first non-iPhone touchscreen mobile device I'm excited about.  I wish I had been selected as a "Real Reviewer" of the Pre after applying for a chance on Palm's site, but I'm sure one of my friends will purchase it and I'll have a chance to try it out then.

It's this kind of eagerness from potential users that Palm needs in order to succeed.  I'm not anticipating that they'll beat Apple or RIM, but they need to contend with them for awhile for two big reasons: 1) More touchscreen smartphones mean more reasons to jump ship.  If one carrier has the more desirable phone, the other carriers will do everything they can to remain competitive - which means lowered data rates and/or better deals on new phones.  2) Competition breeds innovation.  The Pre does some things that other smartphones can't do.  When the other guys catch up, Palm will need to up the ante with the next big thing.  The more competition for the iPhone and Blackberry, the better for all of us.

On the other side of the argument, there are three things working against Palm that could hinder the success of the Pre.  1) Apple's new iPhone will (allegedly) be announced two days after the Pre's release.  Once that happens, all blogs/tech publications will be fixated on Apple's latest iteration of their touchscreen tyke and other devices will fall by the wayside.  2) Sprint's network is mediocre at best.  I know a lot of people carry on about AT&T, but in my experience Sprint's customer service and cellular service are atrocious.  It may be different elsewhere, but I doubt it and I doubt that a lot of people will make the switch the way they did when the iPhone was released.  3) Palm itself.  Palm's history of lackluster software and awkward cellphones (Centro anyone?) isn't helping it push this new phone to the masses.  It needs to get a couple of solid professional reviews under its belt and then let the blogosphere take over.  Once word gets out that the Pre is the real deal, that should help boost its popularity and keep it afloat.

My word to those of you quick to put down the Pre - use it first.  I've seen so many comments in various forums saying how the iPhone is a toy and isn't worth the price.  Many of these (for lack of a better word) stupid comments come from those who've never used one for more than five minutes and I'm sure similar sentiments will be expressed about the Pre.  That's the problem with the majority of people who post in forums - they feel that if the piece of technology they've been waiting for is missing even one item off their laundry list of desired features, that it's a worthless piece of trash.  No phone is perfect.  No computer is perfect.  Nothing is perfect, so my best advice is to stop worrying about what this (or any other phone) doesn't have and enjoy what it does have.  I've gone two years without cut, copy and paste on my iPhone and I've been quite pleased.  I went many years without a touchscreen - I'm still in one piece.  I'm sure that you'll go for awhile without one or two features on the Pre and you'll survive. Maybe Palm will address it in a firmware update or a new unit, maybe not.  However, don't let that deter you from trying something potentially awesome.

Here are some links to different resources on the web concerning the Palm Pre:

Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_Pre
YouTube demonstration: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRnlzbuLRwM

PS: Here are some great comments from the YouTube demonstration I linked to above (I love these things - stupid people make me laugh...):

By 8850407: i f*****g hate the iphone, but i dont think this is gonna beat it apple justs has too much cool applications for everyday life, what could i possibly do with this phone other than browse the net and other media are there even games for this, dont think so , games are a must for a mobile device without downloadable its gonna be boring but the touch is fantastic, its on par with the iphone and, thats my non biased comment

By timcarlisle77:
I just took a huge dump, and I pooped a new Palm Pre. It came out real smooth, like it wanted to be an iphone. However, I never pooped an iphone.

and finally, by mexicano899: i have an iphone & i thought it be the best but i was wrong it freezes & turns off soo dont get an iphone the palm pre look very good looks like it will make life easy sooo im switching 2 sprint when it comes out my friend works in sprint & she say the palm pre look very good & smooth lol soo i think everyone should get the pre & plus it has wireless charging SOOO BETTER THEN AN IPHONE WAY BETTER SOOO SAY GOODBYE 2 THE IPHONE CHEAP ASS PHONE LOL

Ahhh...thanks Internet - I feel refreshed!



Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Heroes: Getting Better, "Journalists" Not Helping

I know this isn't tech news, but it's something that irks me every time I see it: A highly respected, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist adequately and creatively dissects the latest episode of Heroes, eloquently pointing out the intricacies of the varying storylines.  Then, when the analysis is complete, a slew of commentators intellectually discuss the well-developed, carefully crafted piece and proceed to (in a sophisticated manner, of course) deduce how the series could better improve itself and answer some questions that fans have been asking ever since season 2.

Just kidding.

Some person who's allowed to write for an online publication and calls herself a journalist, goes on a rampage over the last episode of Heroes because it didn't live up to her expectations. The "article" is a page long diatribe blasting the writers for being less-than-stellar and not wrapping up plot lines the way the author would like, followed by thread upon thread of knuckle-dragging mouth-breathers agreeing with her and spewing such gems as (and I sh*t you not):

"Maybe in the next season they'll reveal that President Worf is a mutant with the power to grow a weird-looking forehead and say things like "If you were any other man, I would kill you right where you stand" in some alien-sounding language. Oh, wait, that would be suspiciously akin to plagiarism. Then, again, this is Heroes after all..." - Roklimber

and

"...What I'd like to see is Sylar on a marathon breast cancer walk... with shape-shifty cameos from his mom. (With all his screwy DNA issues from the shifty process he/she is bound to get breast cancer...)" - Mercurial Chimaera

Wow.  I am a better person for having read those pearls of wisdom.  Thank you.

To be honest, I do feel that the show has been a bit lacking in terms of plot and character development.  However, it's not entirely the show's fault - the writers' strike killed the second season (in terms of both length and plot development).  Since then, it's struggled to get back on its feet and I am hopeful that when the new season premiers, it returns to its roots and the things that made the first season so excellent.  A few suggestions might be:

- Less jumping around from character arc to character arc
- Don't introduce so many "heroes" at once
- Give us some more villains to follow, rather than just Sylar
- Give everyone their original powers back

I miss Hiro being able to both stop time AND teleport without getting a nosebleed.  I miss Peter's ability to walk by someone and gain their power.

In response to this riveting work by i09's Annalee Newitz, I say the following:

The tone and anger you took in your article were both unwarranted and just plain dumb.  It's a television show.  I know you're upset with the direction in which they took Sylar - I am too.  However, I also know of three different ways to fix your problem: Channel Up, Channel Down, and Power.  If you don't like the show anymore, use one of those three buttons to remedy the situation. 

I will continue to follow the show for as long as it's on - I'm invested in the characters.  I love the stories and I'm always eager to see what's coming next - and I know I'm not the only one.  I haven't given up on the show and I hope more people will stand by it.  Will it ever be as awesome as season 1?  Probably not.  No show ever is.

When Heroes first aired, it was completely different to everything else that was on TV at the time.  It was a fresh series that had nowhere to go but up.  Combine the premise with some really great promos (I still get chills when I see Claire attempt to kill herself by jumping off the platform in that "home video") and you've got yourself a certifiable hit.

The one thing I will say is that the season premises - just discovering their powers, a potential virus to eradicate those with abilities, giving everyone on earth a power, villains, and the government hunting down the specials - are really great.  They're outlines for fantastic volumes.  Now that the season is over, the writers have the opportunity to go back and find the magic that made the first season so great and (God willing) make Heroes the show we've all hoped it would become - super-powered.

For now, though, I'll just teleport-on-by the yokels who get paid to rant incessantly (and I suggest you do the same). 

The difference between me and them, you ask?  I do it for free.



Powered by ScribeFire.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Has Twitter Pecked Facebook's Eyes Out?

Facebook, once a place for the privileged few (I mean, those still in college), soon opened its doors to high schoolers, then to the world.  Now that everyone and their mother (literally) are on Facebook, is it doomed to the same fate that has affected sites like Friendster and MySpace?  Are we done with Facebook?

The (not so) new wave in social networking is Twitter - a micro-blogging site that allows people to post what are, at their most basic level, Facebook status updates in 140 characters or less.  Twitter has nothing to do with Facebook, but the analogy seems to fit.  It's a place where anyone can sign up and "tweet" about whatever is going on in their lives: "I just ate a pancake," "Off to the bathroom - wish me luck," and other sophisticated offerings.

Twitter has been around since 2006, but didn't really catch on until news about politicians tweeting during a Presidential address took flight.  Since then, everyone from celebrities (Greg Grunberg, Kevin Smith for example) to the average housewife has a Twitter account.

In its most useful form, Twitter has become a secondary RSS feed - another way to get important/interesting news.  On the opposite side, Twitter is a way to feed the ego - a way for average people to feel like they have numerous friends because their followers range in the hundreds, sometimes thousands.  In both instances, this is where Twitter "out-socials" Facebook.

Facebook is about "friends" - people you know who you can connect with as long as they confirm your friend request.  Once the "Confirm" button is clicked, you are welcomed into their closed-off circle of acquaintances.  Sometimes, you're one of 500 - other times, you're one of five.  However, Facebook, even though it's open to the public, still seems closed off.  It still fuels the clique mentality that permeated high school, college, work life, and beyond.  If an invite to a party is sent on Facebook and you're not the sender's friend, you can pretty much guarantee you're not going.  If a dozen people are tagged in a note and you're not, you're probably going to be upset and a little hurt.  Twitter's not like that.  Twitter eliminates the class system and puts regular citizens on the same level as politicians and Hollywood royalty.  Where else would you be able to communicate with Oprah or Ashton directly?  How great would it be if you posted a link and Shaq found it interesting enough to re-tweet and link to your profile?  You don't get that type of interactivity with a Facebook or MySpace because that's not how they work.  Twitter truly is about social networking - you can follow whomever you choose and they can follow you back.  If they don't follow you, then at least you can see what they're talking about and comment on it.

Facebook has tried to mimic this with their news feed, but it's not the same.  Since the news feed is updated any time someone makes a minor update to their profile, it's pretty easy to get lost in the fold.  That awesome video you found on YouTube? - trapped between Person A's status update and Person C's addition of 11 favorite movies and 300 photographs from their trip to Cancun.

What does everyone else think?  Are you done with Facebook?  Do you love Twitter?  Do you hate both and use something completely different?  Leave a comment and let's start the discussion...



Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Amazon Unveils HD Video on Demand

  If you have a computer, a TiVo 3 or a Roku set-top box, then you can take advantage of Amazon's new HD VOD service.  They offer TV shows and movies in glorious high definition available for immediate streaming over the Internet.  Check it out here: Amazon HD Video on Demand



Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Point Proven

Remember those obnoxious flame wars I mentioned in my "Response" post yesterday?  Well, feel free to read this article from Silicon Valley Insider concerning Microsoft's ads, then peruse the sophisticated ramblings of fanboys (and girls!) on both sides.  My personal favorite (possibly NSFW language below):

"Lulz, seriously people defending mac just make me rage. why because they are stupid. You can buy I high end PC or two regular pcs with the same specs of a mac with the same price as a mac. Mac are only for kids you say? yes thats why they have them in schools. I you never learned to used windows or Linux, you are just plain retarded, and don't come to the excuse that you are not a computer scientist or something like that. If you never learned to use a Operative system that is a little bit more complicated and you must WORK with it to keep ruining like you want it to,you are a dumbass and illiterate faggot, its not my fault and i don't care.(YOU ARE THE ONE WASTING MONEY)" - Anon

Doesn't get any more eloquent than that!  Check out the article here: Microsoft's Lame New Anti-Apple Ad: Macs Are For Kids



Powered by ScribeFire.

10%-50% Off History Channel DVDs

Need an added resource for that paper on the Founding Fathers?  Doing your masters thesis on God vs. Satan?  Check out the History Channel shop and get anywhere from 10% to 50% off their selection of DVDs: History Channel Shop



Powered by ScribeFire.

Firefox Add-On Must-Haves

I've got two links to two different articles concerning Firefox add-ons.  The first is geared toward web developers and has such gems as Firebug and ColorZilla (a friggin' lifesaver when Photoshop is not playing nice).  The other has an amalgam of different add-ons, some dev based, some email based.  Enjoy!

CNet Web Dev Add-Ons
EveryJoe.com Preferred Add-Ons



Powered by ScribeFire.